<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marketing Options® &#187; Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingoptions.com/tag/canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingoptions.com</link>
	<description>and Steve Carlson....Blogging Together as a Team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:39:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Thank You, Mrs. Clinton</title>
		<link>http://marketingoptions.com/thank-you-mrs-clinton/</link>
		<comments>http://marketingoptions.com/thank-you-mrs-clinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Post by Steve Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingoptions.com/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Hillary Clinton’s position on the Falklands this week provides Canada with an opportunity to right an old wrong imposed by the United States just over a century ago. The American Secretary of State encouraged Argentina and Britain to sit down and talk about their claims and the future of these tiny islands, much to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><meta name="keywords" content="Hillary Clinton, United States, Falklands, Argentina, Alaska, Canada, Britain, Theodore Roosevelt, Stephen Harper, Klondike, Maine, Elihu Root, Sir Charles Tupper, Steve Carlson, Marketing Options®" /></p>
<p><a href="http://marketingoptions.com/~moexchan/about "><img src="http://www.marketingoptions.com/mo_images/steve_for_posts.gif" alt="Profile of Steve Carlson" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em;"/></a></p>
<p>Hillary Clinton’s position on the Falklands this week provides Canada with an opportunity to right an old wrong imposed by the United States just over a century ago. The American Secretary of State encouraged Argentina and Britain to sit down and talk about their claims and the future of these tiny islands, much to the chagrin of the Brits whose position has been no-way unless the islands’ inhabitants agree to such negotiations. Since Clinton is so gung-ho on talking, Prime Minister Stephen Harper should insist that the Americans look to their own backyard and re-open the issue over the Alaskan panhandle. Canadians who know their history appreciate that blatant travesty of justice this old border dispute represents.<span id="more-490"></span></p>
<p>Let me refresh your memory. Around the time of the Yukon Gold Rush, the exact location of the Alaskan border with Canada was fuzzy. As men and equipment poured across the panhandle on their way to the Klondike, it became an issue. Finally in 1903 Britain and the U.S. came to an agreement on how to settle the precise location of the boundary — three judges representing Canada and three representing the U.S. would be appointed by their corresponding countries to settle the dispute once and for all.</p>
<p>Theodore Roosevelt, the cowboy president, was busy overseeing the expansion of U.S. imperialism (Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the Philippines) with the support of his big stick. Not surprisingly, he took the sensitive stance that Canada’s position, “is an outrage, pure and simple. They have no more right to the land in question than they have to Maine.” In that spirit of impartiality, the U.S. appointed three politicians who had no doubts as to whose cause was just. In fact one of them, Elihu Root, was the Secretary of War. Root’s appointment was entirely appropriate considering that Roosevelt had secretly informed Britain that if the resolution didn’t go his way, he would “ask Congress for permission to run the line (border) as we claim it,&#8230;without regard for the attitude of England and Canada.”</p>
<p>The Canadian contingent included a Toronto lawyer and Sir Louis Jetté, the Lieutenant-Govenor of Quebec, both of whom fought hard for Canada’s position. The fly in the ointment was the third member, Lord Alverstone, Lord Chief Justice of England, who was there because Canada, as a colony, still did not have control over its own foreign policy. Alverstone voted with the Americans and Roosevelt got the border demarcation that he wanted. Canadians were outraged, one prominent citizen, Sir Charles Tupper, summing it up succinctly with, “The whole course of British negotiations with the United States is marked with a line of gravestones under which Canadian rights are buried.”</p>
<p>Considering all this, Canadians should be most appreciative of Mrs. Clinton’s generous new position espousing the merits of “friendly mediation”. I feel certain that a fair and final negotiation would split the Alaskan panhandle in two equal portions, giving the southern half to Canada. And as restitution for this past wrong and to put Sir Charles Tupper finally at rest, the U.S. might just as well throw in Maine, too.</p>
<p><em><small><center>Copyright &copy; by Marketing Options Inc. 2010.<center></small></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marketingoptions.com/thank-you-mrs-clinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blood from Stone</title>
		<link>http://marketingoptions.com/blood-from-stone/</link>
		<comments>http://marketingoptions.com/blood-from-stone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Post by Steve Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingoptions.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

David Murdoch will be out for blood as the Scots meet Canada’s champion Kevin Martin this Saturday. If you think Murdoch represents Great Britain, you’re sadly mistaken. Every Canadian curler knows Murdoch and his team of Byers, Smith and MacDonald as simply The Scottish Team. Those same Canadian curlers also know that the game of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><meta name="keywords" content="curling, Olympics, Vancouver, Murdoch, Martin, Byers, Smith, MacDonald, Hebert, Kennedy, Morris, William Wallace, Rob Roy, Robert the Bruce, Shakespeare, Macbeth, Steve Carlson, Marketing OptionsÂ®" /></p>
<p><a href="http://marketingoptions.com/~moexchan/about "><img src="http://www.marketingoptions.com/mo_images/steve_for_posts.gif" alt="Profile of Steve Carlson" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em;"/></a></p>
<p>David Murdoch will be out for blood as the Scots meet Canada’s champion Kevin Martin this Saturday. If you think Murdoch represents Great Britain, you’re sadly mistaken. Every Canadian curler knows Murdoch and his team of Byers, Smith and MacDonald as simply <em>The Scottish Team</em>. Those same Canadian curlers also know that the game of curling is an ancient plot against the New World, hatched by the devious Scots centuries ago. </p>
<p>The terrible feud that has grown between our countries dates back to the very beginning of curling near Paisley Abbey in Scotland. Curling would not have been born then except that times were difficult. Local stonemasons were particularly suffering. In fact, building new stone cottages was at such an all-time low that the stonemasons decided to heave their building rocks into the White Cart Water, a tributary of the River Clyde, as a gesture of protest. Not an easy task. Just carrying these granite stones to the water’s edge was a challenge because the banks of shore were so steep. Several enterprising masons solved the problem by attaching temporary wooden handles to each rock the night before the protest.<span id="more-476"></span></p>
<p>Dawn broke the next day to reveal local residents, including the Abbot and most of the monks, gathered along the water’s edge to view the coming spectacle. Shortly thereafter, the husky Scottish stonemasons arrived, all carrying a rock in each hand by the wooden handles. But the wintery night had been bitterly cold and ice had formed for almost 150 feet out into the water. Transporting the rocks out over the ice to open water was impossible. Each rock weighed over 40 pounds. The stonemasons would break through and drown. Ever enterprising, the masons decided that with a stout push they could slide the rocks from the shoreline across the ice and into the water.</p>
<p>The first mason propelled a rock across the ice but it failed to reach the open water. What to do now? The masons decided that on the next throw the burliest of them would give a mighty heave and throw a second rock with such force that it would strike the first and both rocks would slide into the water. But, as the burliest threw his rock, his foot slipped and his rock spun out of control across the ice. The crowd groaned, clearly the direction of the second rock was such that it would never come close to hitting the first.</p>
<p>But then a strange thing happened. As the second rock spun across the ice, its path began to turn in the direction of the first rock until it made hard contact and both rocks were driven into the water. The crowd cheered heartily, feeling no doubt that the Abbot’s silent blessing had turned the second rock to its target. A local farmer stepped forward with a shovel and “hacked” depressions in the frozen shoreline so the next masons could brace their toes for the next throws. The crowd even clapped in appreciation as a brave maiden ventured a dozen feet out on the treacherous ice, sweeping the frost from the path of the next rocks with her broom. </p>
<p>As the protest continued that morning, one spectator is recorded as saying that as he watched the clergy “a smile of divine inspiration slowly crept across the face of the Abbot”. (Of course, he said it in Gaelic.) When the last rock was thrown, the Abbot gathered the stonemasons together and told them of his plot to put every Scottish mason back to work, a fearsome conspiracy that was to addict many Canadians.</p>
<p>“No longer,” the Abott said (in more Gaelic), “shall ye and ye sons shape the granite for only home and hearth and endure poverty. As we have watched yon rocks curl across the ice this morn, we have been witness to a new feat of strength and skill for all men. But for now those truly marked to practice this new challenge live across the sea in a new country where the ice never disappears. A prosperous countryside, riche in furs. A country where, with mine blessings, the growing population might just be of such mental aptitude that we can convince them to purchase the one thing faire Scotland has in endless supply&#8230; granite rocks.”</p>
<p>And so the Abbot first implemented his devious plan across what is now called the Maritimes, Quebec and Ontario. The long days and nights of winter rang with the shouts and laughter of our forefathers. Soon women felt the addiction and eventually even our vulnerable children. But no part of Canada suffered more from the Abbot’s wily machinations than the West. Farmers who slaved hard in the prairie heat during the summer months had endless time during the other three seasons to participate in what by then was called curling. Families living on those lonely western farms in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta were torn asunder unless all participated but in that crucible were born some of Canada’s greatest curlers. Wheat joined fur in the holds of ships returning to Scotland. What did Canadians have to show for it? A bigger pile of rocks with handles.</p>
<p>How shrewd were those pecuniary Scots but the Abbot’s ancient plot was to backfire. Canadians like Russ Howard, the father of the Free Guard Zone, have snatched the modern game away from its country of birth. Scotland may squeal but accept this new reality of ownership they must — just like Canadians have had to accept the loss of the modern game of basketball to our southern neighbour. (Give it a few years and some more Yankee revisionist history and the U.S. will have always <em>owned</em> it.)</p>
<p>Scotland vs. Canada will be the most exciting match of the 2010 Olympiad. Kevin Martin, The Old Bear from Alberta, is not named after the rather benign eastern Canadian black bear but the western grizzly (Ursus arctos <em>horribilis</em>).  On their best days, Hebert, Kennedy and Morris are more than capable of neutralizing their counterparts. But it will be a clash of curling champions at all positions. Amateur genealogists have traced the lineage of Byers, Smith and MacDonald back to William Wallace, Rob Roy and Robert the Bruce.</p>
<p>As for David Murdoch? One aspiring historian has suggested that he is a direct descendent of a great Scottish king made famous by William Shakespeare&#8230; Macbeth himself. Readers can be forgiven for thinking that Macbeth is a fictional character. In fact, he ruled Scotland from 1040 to 1057. Macbeth did kill Duncan whose son, Malcolm, eventually defeated Macbeth in battle at Dunsinane and replaced him as king — much as the Bard’s witches predicted. The same historian has also suggested that one of the convolutions of the name <em>Malcolm</em> over the last millennium is <em>Martin</em>.</p>
<p>If too much of this writing seems speculative, one truth remains certain. Come Saturday night at the Vancouver Olympic Centre, blood will flow.</p>
<p><em><small><center>Copyright &copy; by Marketing Options Inc. 2010.<center></small></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marketingoptions.com/blood-from-stone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper Kicks Some Obama&#8230;, But</title>
		<link>http://marketingoptions.com/harper-kicks-some-obama-but/</link>
		<comments>http://marketingoptions.com/harper-kicks-some-obama-but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Post by Steve Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingoptions.com/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

This post is not by a Canadian who dislikes Americans. Nothing could be further from the truth. I like Americans. Most of the ones I’ve met are smart and friendly. I just dislike most American politicians. That’s only a misdemeanor compared to how I feel about Canadian politicians. Visiting Ottawa is a pleasure for me. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><meta name="keywords" content="Canada, United States, Harper, Obama, The Heritage Foundation, Heritage Foundation, 2010 Index of Economic Freedom, Steve Carlson, Marketing Options®" /></p>
<p><a href="http://marketingoptions.com/~moexchan/about "><img src="http://www.marketingoptions.com/mo_images/steve_for_posts.gif" alt="Profile of Steve Carlson" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em;"/></a></p>
<p>This post is not by a Canadian who dislikes Americans. Nothing could be further from the truth. I like Americans. Most of the ones I’ve met are smart and friendly. I just dislike most American politicians. That’s only a misdemeanor compared to how I feel about Canadian politicians. Visiting Ottawa is a pleasure for me. I love the galleries, the museums and the strolls along the locks. But I have never ever entered my country’s parliament buildings. Suffice to say that I suffer from high blood pressure and I just know if I pass through those portals, my heart will explode in my chest. I know this attitude towards my government is immature, but when you’ve been diddled by them for 66 years of your life, it’s tough to be magnanimous. For the other three years, I lived in the U.S. and didn’t pay taxes — and pre-schoolers don’t get too caught up in politics.<span id="more-448"></span></p>
<p>Canada doesn’t have a popular right wing party. Our New Democratic and Liberal parties are left wing. Our Conservative party straddles a middle-of-the-road position. That’s why I was somewhat astonished to learn that The Heritage Foundation seems to be saying that the U.S. is sliding further down the slope to a government-controlled welfare state.</p>
<p>The Heritage Foundation describes itself as America’s “most broadly supported public policy research institute, with more than 580,000 individual, foundation and corporate donors.”  It has just published the 2010 Index of Economic Freedom which measured just how free the economies of nations are around the world. Canada scored an overall 80.4, placing 7th highest (freest) in the world. Scores are out of 100 and represent an average calculated from ten components which are also scored out of 100. What’s amazing is that the United States stood in 8th place with an overall score of 78. (An overall score of 80 is required to be designated a free economy — at 78, the U.S. is categorized as partially free.)</p>
<p>Here are the ten components and the scores for Canada and the United States. Best scores (if you believe in a free economy) are in italics:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Business Freedom</strong> — <em>Canada 96.5</em>, United States 91.3</li>
<li><strong>Trade Freedom</strong> — <em>Canada 88.1</em>, United States 86.9</li>
<li><strong>Fiscal Freedom</strong> — <em>Canada 76.7</em>, United States 67.5</li>
<li><strong>Government Spending</strong> — Canada 54.1, <em>United States 58.0</em></li>
<li><strong>Monetary Freedom</strong> — Canada 75.4, <em>United States 78.1</em></li>
<li><strong>Investment Freedom</strong> — <em>Canada 75.0, United States 75.0</em></li>
<li><strong>Financial Freedom</strong> —  <em>Canada 80.0</em>, United States 70.0</li>
<li><strong>Property Rights</strong> — <em>Canada 90.0</em>, United States 85.0</li>
<li><strong>Freedom from Corruption</strong> — <em>Canada 87.0</em>, United States 73.0</li>
<li><strong>Labour Freedom</strong> — Canada 81.5, <em>United States 94.8</em></ul>
</li>
<p>One might conclude that Harper is doing a better job than Obama. Maybe but, and it’s a big but, before we get too carried away let’s give the U.S president a chance. Tonight is his State of the Union address. For a 100 years, the United States has stood out as the torch bearer of free enterprise. Tonight the world will be waiting to hear his words and the direction he plans to take America over the rest of his term. If he falters, Canadians had better be ready to catch that torch. It may not be an Olympic gold, silver or bronze but when you’re 7th place in the greater game of opportunity and freedom for you and your children, it’s the biggest tournament of all.</p>
<p><em><small><center>Copyright &copy; by Marketing Options Inc. 2010.<center></small></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marketingoptions.com/harper-kicks-some-obama-but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep Your Enemies Closer</title>
		<link>http://marketingoptions.com/keep-your-enemies-closer/</link>
		<comments>http://marketingoptions.com/keep-your-enemies-closer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Post by Steve Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingoptions.com/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Last week I visited the Canadian War Museum in Ottawa. I took a few pictures in the World War 1 section and then put the camera away in frustration. On the way over, I had made the mistake of driving by that mausoleum on Parliament Hill. My ability to focus on gas attacks and trench [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><meta name="keywords" content="detainees, soldiers, Canadian soldiers, Afghanistan, Afghan government, Canadian Government, Geneva Convention, Steve Carlson, Marketing Options®" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.marketingoptions.com/mo_images/P1000484.jpg" alt="Panasonic DMC-LX3, Leica 5.1mm, f/2.8, Aperture Priority, 1/8s, -0.3EV, ISO 200" style="margin-right: 4em; margin-bottom: 2em;"/></a></p>
<p>Last week I visited the Canadian War Museum in Ottawa. I took a few pictures in the World War 1 section and then put the camera away in frustration. On the way over, I had made the mistake of driving by that mausoleum on Parliament Hill. My ability to focus on gas attacks and trench warfare was gone: by the time I reached the museum, all I could think about was the war in Afghanistan.<span id="more-402"></span></p>
<p>The treatment of detainees captured by Canadian forces and transferred to the Afghan government has our opposition politicians all aflutter. So the charges go, the Afghan government subsequently tortured some of those detainees. The oppositions’ finger pointing is a bit confounding considering that many of these politicians are members of the party responsible for drafting the agreement that established these transfers in the first place.</p>
<p>Now I hear our troops’ morale is suffering because they feel they are being vilified back home for passing on the detainees. I’ve listened to the Canadian generals and the investigating committee on TV and here’s my understanding of the situation. First, Canadian troops themselves didn’t participate in any alleged torturing. Second, it’s not the job of a Canadian soldier to investigate and pass judgement as to whether or not the Geneva Convention is being violated. Third, monitoring of detainee treatment by the Afghan government is supposed to be the responsibility of civilian organizations. Our troops have nothing to be sorry for except perhaps for the lack of support they received over this issue from the conservative government.</p>
<p>Combat troops have to be able to quickly pass on detainees in a war zone. Their job is on the battlefield. Guarding prisoners for any longer than is absolutely necessary is a significant burden and a dangerous distraction. Our politicians are now going to endlessly drag the issue of torture through the House of Commons in one form or another. Committees will write reports, make recommendations, castigate a few, exonerate others. One way or another, in the end the Afghan government is going to continue to receive detainees captured by our troops. And one way or another, this issue of mistreatment and torture will linger on.</p>
<p>Aside from packing up our troops and bringing them home, there is a solution to the problem — ship the detainees captured by Canadian troops back to Canada for processing and internment here. This action may take some political backbone with our NATO allies and the Afghan government, but surely we have a few politicians around with the spinal fortitude to handle the job. I think this solution would be a big boost to the morale of our troops in Afghanistan. It would also let the troops know that the folks back home were willing to do their part to help out.</p>
<p>Once on Canadian soil, politicians have direct access to the treatment of the detainees. Members of the press, monitoring organizations, and citizens concerned about the proper treatment of the detainees can be more assured that the information they receive is unstaged and honest. Since these detainees are not in uniform, there would be ample opportunity to sort out any lingering issues as to individual innocence or guilt. And our government can move on to address other issues of greater concern to most Canadians.</p>
<p>Canada is experienced running camps for prisoners of war. Thousands of German POWs were interned in Canada in World War II. Is there a difference between a prisoner of war and detainee? Should detainee be given preferential treatment? My understanding is that Canadian troops only detain those who have harmed or intended to harm them so I can’t see one.</p>
<p>There are issues that need to be considered. Saving the most challenging for last, one concern might be where are we going to locate these Detainee Camps? Obviously, not in downtown Toronto. Canada has endless, under-populated areas, which are relatively accessible to civilization, that could be used.</p>
<p>Who would guard the Detainee Camps? Civilian correctional services could handle the detainees inside the camps while the army could provide the outside security from parties trying to forcibly enter the camps. (No direct contact to the detainees should keep the government off the military’s back.) Bear in mind, the number of detainees will never begin to approach the thousands of German POWs who poured into Canada.</p>
<p>What about fanaticism among the detainees? What about it? The German POW camps had fanatical, hard-core, Nazi followers who endeavoured to impose their control within the Canadian camps. They set up secret kangaroo courts that were known to have POWs beaten or even sentenced to death by their own hand. Our system handled it.</p>
<p>Which leads us to the testy issue of the detainees being repatriated after the hostilities are over. (This has to be done under the Geneva Convention.) Since hostilities are over, the current government which is now being accused of torture (or its successor) would have less reason to mistreat the returning detainees. If the Taliban form part of the government at the time of repatriation, they will provide for the detainees’ safety.</p>
<p>The most challenging issue of all that must be addressed before setting up Detainee Camps is why do this if Canada is pulling out its troops in 2011. That’s easy — because, regardless of what our politicians say now, we will have troops in this theatre of conflict after that date. </p>
<p><em><small><center>Copyright &copy; by Marketing Options Inc. 2010.<center></small></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marketingoptions.com/keep-your-enemies-closer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

